xxx

測試 1 顯示 / 顯示

在看某一本小說的時候, 才開始對簡愛有一點印象 .

原本今天是想去看黑天鵝 , 但是因為想去吃飯 ,

no no no

By James W. Loewen, Saturday, February 26, 12:01 AM One hundred fifty years after the Civil War began, we’re still fighting it — or at least fighting over its history. I’ve polled thousands of high school history teachers and spoken about the war to audiences across the country, and there is little agreement even about why the South seceded. Was it over slavery? States’ rights? Tariffs and taxes? 112 Comments Weigh InCorrections? Gallery Gallery: Radiation in Japan, bus-stop attack in Israel, Warren Buffett in India and more in the day in photos: Barry Bonds goes to court, inmates fill sandbags in Wisconsin, unions rally for jobs in Alabama and more from around the world. As the nation begins to commemorate the anniversaries of the war’s various battles — from Fort Sumter to Appomattox — let’s first dispense with some of the more prevalent myths about why it all began. 1. The South seceded over states’ rights. Confederate states did claim the right to secede, but no state claimed to be seceding for that right. In fact, Confederates opposed states’ rights — that is, the right of Northern states not to support slavery. On Dec. 24, 1860, delegates at South Carolina’s secession convention adopted a “Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union.” It noted “an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery” and protested that Northern states had failed to “fulfill their constitutional obligations” by interfering with the return of fugitive slaves to bondage. Slavery, not states’ rights, birthed the Civil War. South Carolina was further upset that New York no longer allowed “slavery transit.” In the past, if Charleston gentry wanted to spend August in the Hamptons, they could bring their cook along. No longer — and South Carolina’s delegates were outraged. In addition, they objected that New England states let black men vote and tolerated abolitionist societies. According to South Carolina, states should not have the right to let their citizens assemble and speak freely when what they said threatened slavery. Other seceding states echoed South Carolina. “Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery — the greatest material interest of the world,” proclaimed Mississippi in its own secession declaration, passed Jan. 9, 1861. “Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of the commerce of the earth. . . . A blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization.” The South’s opposition to states’ rights is not surprising. Until the Civil War, Southern presidents and lawmakers had dominated the federal government. The people in power in Washington always oppose states’ rights. Doing so preserves their own. 2. Secession was about tariffs and taxes. During the nadir of post-civil-war race relations — the terrible years after 1890 when town after town across the North became all-white “sundown towns” and state after state across the South prevented African Americans from voting — “anything but slavery” explanations of the Civil War gained traction. To this day Confederate sympathizers successfully float this false claim, along with their preferred name for the conflict: the War Between the States. At the infamous Secession Ball in South Carolina, hosted in December by the Sons of Confederate Veterans, “the main reasons for secession were portrayed as high tariffs and Northern states using Southern tax money to build their own infrastructure,” The Washington Post reported. These explanations are flatly wrong. High tariffs had prompted the Nullification Controversy in 1831-33, when, after South Carolina demanded the right to nullify federal laws or secede in protest, President Andrew Jackson threatened force. No state joined the movement, and South Carolina backed down. Tariffs were not an issue in 1860, and Southern states said nothing about them. Why would they? Southerners had written the tariff of 1857, under which the nation was functioning. Its rates were lower than at any point since 1816. 3. Most white Southerners didn’t own slaves, so they wouldn’t secede for slavery. Indeed, most white Southern families had no slaves. Less than half of white Mississippi households owned one or more slaves, for example, and that proportion was smaller still in whiter states such as Virginia and Tennessee. It is also true that, in areas with few slaves, most white Southerners did not support secession. West Virginia seceded from Virginia to stay with the Union, and Confederate troops had to occupy parts of eastern Tennessee and northern Alabama to hold them in line. However, two ideological factors caused most Southern whites, including those who were not slave-owners, to defend slavery. First, Americans are wondrous optimists, looking to the upper class and expecting to join it someday. In 1860, many subsistence farmers aspired to become large slave-owners. So poor white Southerners supported slavery then, just as many low-income people support the extension of George W. Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy now. Second and more important, belief in white supremacy provided a rationale for slavery. As the French political theorist Montesquieu observed wryly in 1748: “It is impossible for us to suppose these creatures [enslaved Africans] to be men; because allowing them to be men, a suspicion would follow that we ourselves are not Christians.” Given this belief, most white Southerners — and many Northerners, too — could not envision life in black-majority states such as South Carolina and Mississippi unless blacks were in chains. Georgia Supreme Court Justice Henry Benning, trying to persuade the Virginia Legislature to leave the Union, predicted race war if slavery was not protected. “The consequence will be that our men will be all exterminated or expelled to wander as vagabonds over a hostile earth, and as for our women, their fate will be too horrible to contemplate even in fancy.” Thus, secession would maintain not only slavery but the prevailing ideology of white supremacy as well.

吳傳 事件一覧 動畫一覧 吳事件1-戰鬥的意義 吳事件2-詭異的火焰-孫堅- 吳事件3 猛虎想要的東西 吳事件4 人馬合一 吳事件5 年輕的血潮 吳動畫1-傳國玉璽 吳事件6-慧眼所注視的未來 吳事件7-對家族的關懷 吳事件8-義的武勇 吳事件9-暴威之武 吳事件10-江東之虎殞落 吳事件11-嶄新的決心 吳事件12-不屈的鬥志 吳事件13-江東小霸王 吳事件14-相逢 吳事件15-仁義之漢 吳事件16-亂了 吳事件17-幻影 吳事件18-美麗的守護者 吳事件19-小霸王所託付的事物 吳事件20-為了什麼人 吳事件21-磊落的漢子 吳動畫2-重大決定 吳事件22-宿將的咆哮 吳動畫3-啟程 吳事件23-遮蔽勝利的陰影 吳事件24-箭傷 吳動畫4 周郎遠逝 吳事件25-錦鈴甘寧-奔馳 吳事件26-合淝的守護者 吳事件27-逃走 吳事件28-武聖-現身 吳事件29-勝利的代價 吳事件30-俊英的飛翔 吳事件31-各自的忠義 吳事件32-為誰取得的勝利 吳事件33-君主的戰鬥 吳事件34-孫吳的勝利 吳動畫5-孫吳三代之夢 ～結局～ＥＮＤ 不知道這樣有沒有侵害到版權 不知道會不會被YOUTOBE刪文~(如果有人知道請告訴我) 吳傳動畫已經全部上傳~ 24樓新增魏傳動畫已經全部上傳~ 6代雖然有中文字幕~ 不過字好小~ 我看的有點痛苦~~ 或許會有只買日文版卻看不太懂日文的玩家 會想看看中文版的翻釋吧~~ 家裡的電視畫質沒很好...大家就將就點吧~ > < 我研究很久說~~

從4/1號入手後 原本以為會有很多人上網連線的
連了著3天 幾乎無時無刻都連線配對 不過都遇到沒有人開房的狀態

6代的呂布AI真是令人失望!.....即使修羅下也只是血量厚而已，等著被打~
在三國無雙戰中，他出場後我把他打下圍欄後也跟著跳下去，只見呂布滿場亂跑，不會有任何攻擊，只想跑回他原本出場的地方...........

來來來

來跟我一起說

約定

test

老鼠爺爺 , 磨着牙

大牛哥哥, 不在家

一夜的須臾與永恆

剎那就是一種美的瞬間

Y/Y
Y/Y